Olet sivulla: Home « Ministry « Publications « Monitori « Monitori 3/2007 « Who Are We Allowed to Help?
The first
two weeks were nightmarish. How sour life had become. Constant drowsiness,
hunger pangs that woke me up at three in the morning, and other unpleasant
symptoms of a disrupted body clock. After a one-year stay in the US, Finland
appeared at least as gloomy as my own tired existence. Foul-smelling winos were
creeping out of their holes and an oppressing, unfriendly atmosphere prevailed
in an empty Helsinki.
As I
gradually recovered from my jetlag, a slightly prettier reality slowly
materialized around me. The beautiful July weather certainly helped. In the
radiant summer sunlight, Helsinki came to its own in its glaring cleanliness
and with its picturesque vegetation.
Drunkards
were still lurking around but were suddenly flanked by healthy young people in
expensive designer clothes and trendy hairdos. Cars were brand-new; shopping
bags were full. The Finnish standard of
living, one of the highest in the world, became all too evident as I walked
around the streets of Helsinki. Finns were certainly well off, and this was
confirmed by news coverage of Finland’s "exceptional" economic boom.
And yet,
other observations remained as gloomy as ever. Finland may impress with any
number of economic circus tricks, but as far as cultural diversity is
concerned, this country, it seems, has yet to leave the proverbial Impivaara.
A recent
legal case involving young Somalis in which the court verdict was to deport the
delinquents “back to Africa", as well as the debate about church asylum
are examples of a disappointing state of mind.
What has
leaked out in the discussions about the young Somalis is that, yes, society,
too, must claim its share of the responsibility. Whispers have also been heard
about the fact that these youngsters only launched their "careers" in
crime once they arrived in Finland (as is the case for most criminals with
immigrant backgrounds). In other words, we may have an inkling that, indeed,
something in the circumstances in this country lowers the threshold to criminal
activity.
But that is
about all we have: whispers and inklings. A frank debate would be crucial right
now, to unravel the causes and find workable solutions to the problem. That
debate has yet to begin.
As per
usual, the Somali associations have been impressively pro-active. But, we
mustn’t be lulled into complacently believing that the problem of delinquency
among Somali youths can be solved, merely by focusing on the Somali side of the
equation. This is as much about young immigrants as it is about a whole society
gone astray.
One
positive development is the publication of "Kirkko turvapaikkana",
The Church as a Place of Refuge, a guidebook that the Finnish Ecumenical
Council recently published. It is a moderately formulated but necessary
statement about the unbearable circumstances faced by asylum seekers in Finland
today.
Compared to
other European churches, which have been struggling long, hard, and with much
success to improve the situation of asylum seekers, the reticence of the
Finnish church over the years in the matter has often struck me as
incomprehensibly small-minded. Now, finally, the church is taking a stand,
which even seems to be to the liking of Astrid Thors, our Minister of Migration
and European Affairs. That Thors, who has responded positively to the
publication of the guide, has felt compelled to disapprove of the use of the
word asylum seems to me to be an unnecessary case of splitting hairs. Asylum is originally from the Greek word
asylon, and has, as a concept, been in use long before it became a legal term.
However,
most perplexing was a demand by the Directorate of Immigration for the church
to maintain a “moderate“ attitude in matters concerning asylum. Not to mention
a tactless warning that the church’s stand could lead to an
"epidemic" number of people turning to congregations for help. Is it
really the duty of the Directorate of Immigration to dictate whom the church
may or may not be allowed to help?
This stingy
attitude is nothing but grotesque in a country, which, as we know, is by far
one of the richest in the world.